“
The ultimate aim of the modern movement in biology is in fact to explain all biology in terms of physics and chemistry.
— Francis Crick
The ultimate aim of the modern movement in biology is in fact to explain all biology in terms of physics and chemistry.
And so to those of you who may be vitalists I would make this prophecy: what everyone believed yesterday, and you believe today, only cranks will believe tomorrow.
I argued that it was important not to place too much reliance on any single piece of experimental evidence. It might turn out to be misleading, as the 5.1 Å reflection undoubtedly was. Jim was a little more brash, stating that no fit all the data would have been "carpentered" to do so and would thus be open to suspicion. (pp. 59-60)
Rather than believe that Watson and Crick made the DNA structure, I would rather stress that the structure made Watson and Crick.
Both of us had decided, quite independently of each other, that the central problem in molecular biology was the chemical structure of the gene.
The job of theorists, especially in biology, is to suggest new experiments. A good theory makes not only predictions, but surprising predictions that then turn out to be true. (If its predictions appear obvious to experimentalists, why would they need a theory?)
Before I describe in more detail exactly what is involved in seeing, let me make three general remarks.
